Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-09 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, getting a overall score of 86.6 against 71.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy A50s is extremely older than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, it's design is much thinner and much lighter. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has older 10 version while Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11 version.
Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2408px. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit faster processor than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s takes much clearer photographs and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a smaller camera aperture and a camera with less mega-pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A50s features much more memory for apps and games than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Blackview BL8800 Pro features a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has an 8380mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.