Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, having a overall score of 85.5 against 71.9. The Galaxy A51 is an extremely older device than Blackview BL8800 Pro, but Samsung could make it thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
The Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2408. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51's processor is very similar to the processing unit in Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A51 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a camera with a worse resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures.
The Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has a 110 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.