Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is a lot better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro's 71.9 score. Galaxy A52 5G is an older cellphone than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, but it is noticeably thinner and way lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11.
Blackview BL8800 Pro has just a bit better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2408 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with much more storage to install applications and games than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G's processor is just as good as the processing unit in Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although the Galaxy A52 5G has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Blackview BL8800 Pro has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 8380mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Galaxy A52 5G shoots way better pictures and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.