Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, having a 92.9 score against 71.9. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version and Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11 version. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is older than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, it's design is a lot lighter and incredibly thinner.
The Blackview BL8800 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2408 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit better performance than Blackview BL8800 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 86% larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW captures much clearer videos and photos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.