Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is way better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, having a general score of 90.8 against 71.9. Galaxy Note 20's construction is much lighter and thinner than Blackview BL8800 Pro, even though it was released a little bit more than a year before. Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2408 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with as much storage for apps and games as the Blackview BL8800 Pro one, both of them have the same internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit superior processing unit than Blackview BL8800 Pro. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has an 8380mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a camera with much less megapixels resolution, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.