Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Blackview BL8800 Pro, getting a 98.9 score against 71.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is older than Blackview BL8800 Pro, it's body is notably thinner and extremely lighter. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11, providing the user a couple additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better performance than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little more vivid screen than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because it has a better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a bit larger screen and a little more pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better camera than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back facing camera with a much better resolution. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.