Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 9.2 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, having an 81.2 score against 71.9. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version and Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11. Galaxy Note 3 is an a lot older phone than Blackview BL8800 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it much lighter and way thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3's processing unit is just as good as Blackview BL8800 Pro's processing unit, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a lower amount of RAM and less processing cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional GPU. Galaxy Note 3 has a bit more vivid display than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a quite worse screen density and a little bit smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a smaller aperture and a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels resolution. The Blackview BL8800 Pro has a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Blackview BL8800 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.