Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a lot better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, having an 89 score against 71.9. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy Note10 is incredibly older than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, it's design is thinner and way lighter. The Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have a higher number of pixels per inch of screen, the Blackview BL8800 Pro also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2408px and a little bigger screen.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a little faster CPU than Blackview BL8800 Pro. Both have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because it has more internal memory.
The Galaxy Note10 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The Blackview BL8800 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has an 8380mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.