Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is much better than Blackview BL8800 Pro's 71.9 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's body is incredibly thinner and a lot lighter than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it was released 2 years before. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2408 resolution and a just a bit higher screen pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a slightly better camera than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a lot lower 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images. The Blackview BL8800 Pro features a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.