Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 has an overall score of 80.2, which is much better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro's 71.9 global score. Galaxy Note5 is an extremely older device than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it notably lighter and noticeably thinner anyway. Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit sharper display than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Blackview BL8800 Pro has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Blackview BL8800 Pro has just a little better performance than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Blackview BL8800 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note5 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a camera with a way lower 16 megapixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in low light situations. The Blackview BL8800 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has an 8380mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.