Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is a lot better than Blackview BL8800 Pro, getting a 94.8 score against 71.9. Even though Galaxy S20 is a lot older than Blackview BL8800 Pro, it's construction is a lot lighter and much thinner. Both phones we are comparing have Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version and Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a bit better CPU than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a slightly better screen than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a greater pixel density.
Galaxy S20 features a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 features a superior camera than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution camera, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
The Blackview BL8800 Pro features a way better battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has an 8380mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.