Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is a lot better than Blackview BL8800 Pro, with a 90.8 score against 71.9. These phones have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. Although the Galaxy S20 FE is older than Blackview BL8800 Pro, it's body is much thinner and incredibly lighter.
The Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2408. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE has a little better performance than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much better camera than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a much worse resolution back facing camera, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.