Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a lot better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro's 71.9 score. Even though the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot older than Blackview BL8800 Pro, it's body is way thinner and much lighter. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11, so it counts with some extra features.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because it has a better amount of pixels per inch of screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a quite bigger display. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better camera than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.