Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is a lot better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro's global score of 71.9. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version and Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11, counting with a couple additional features and increased performance. Although the Galaxy S22 and the Blackview BL8800 Pro were released only a couple of months apart, the Galaxy S22 is noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter.
Galaxy S22 counts with a brighter screen than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot brighter display and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy S22 and Blackview BL8800 Pro feature extremely similar memory capacity to store more games and applications, both of them have the same internal memory.
The Galaxy S22 has a little faster processing unit than Blackview BL8800 Pro. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Blackview BL8800 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 126 percent bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much better camera than Blackview BL8800 Pro. They have the same resolution back-facing camera and a same size camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.