Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than Blackview BL8800 Pro's global score of 71.9. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a much lighter and notably thinner device than Blackview BL8800 Pro, even though both were released with only a few months difference. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11, so it counts with some nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because it has a bit bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a better display pixel density and a lot brighter display. Galaxy S22 Ultra's storage capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as Blackview BL8800 Pro's one, both have the same internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little better hardware performance than Blackview BL8800 Pro. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. The Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has an 8380mAh battery size. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.