Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is much better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, getting a 79.5 score against 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy S7 design is noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it was released 6 years before. The Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy S7, because it has more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S7 features a more vivid display than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px, a greater amount of pixels per screen inch and much more brightness. The Galaxy S7 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a much less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations.
The Blackview BL8800 Pro has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Blackview BL8800 Pro has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 179% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.