Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-05-09 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is just a bit better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, with a overall score of 78.1 against 71.9. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11, providing the user a couple additional features and performance enhancements. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge design is way thinner and a lot lighter than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it was released many years before.
Blackview BL8800 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more RAM and more 2.2 GHz cores. Galaxy S7 edge features just a bit better looking screen than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Blackview BL8800 Pro features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S7 edge takes clearer videos and photos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a way less megapixels camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The Blackview BL8800 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has an 8380mAh battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.