Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 has a score of 81.7, which is better than Blackview BL8800 Pro's 71.9 overall score. Even though Samsung Galaxy S8 is incredibly older than Blackview BL8800 Pro, it's body is notably thinner and a lot lighter. The Galaxy S8 has a slightly better looking screen than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a better pixels number per inch of screen.
Galaxy S8 counts with a processor that is just as good as the Blackview BL8800 Pro one, and although the Galaxy S8 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S8 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less MP, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy S8 features just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 256 GB. Blackview BL8800 Pro has a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has an 8380mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.