Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro's 71.9 general score. Samsung Galaxy S9 is an extremely older phone than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it much lighter and noticeably thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has just a bit better looking screen than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a greater display density.
Galaxy S9 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a quite bigger memory for applications and games than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 400 GB.
The Blackview BL8800 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S9 captures a little bit better videos and photos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a back camera with much less mega pixels, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.