Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than Blackview BL8800 Pro, getting a overall score of 87.9 against 71.9. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design is notably lighter and thinner than Blackview BL8800 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a slightly better looking display than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a quite bigger display and much more brightness. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and Blackview BL8800 Pro count with quite similar storage capacity to install games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures greater photos and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels.
Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.