Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro's global score of 71.9. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is extremely older than Blackview BL8800 Pro, it's design is noticeably lighter and thinner. Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version and Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit superior processor than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Blackview BL8800 Pro has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2408 pixels resolution and a quite higher number of pixels per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior camera than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Blackview BL8800 Pro features a way better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.