Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is slightly better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, getting a general score of 79 against 71.9. Both phones in this comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is an much older phone than Blackview BL8800 Pro, but Xiaomi made it lighter and thinner anyway.
The Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2408px resolution and a little bit higher screen pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a CPU that is just as good as Blackview BL8800 Pro's processor, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S takes much better photographs and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture.
The Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has an 8380mAh battery size against 5020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.