Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is much better than the Blackview BL8800, with a overall score of 88.1 against 71.9. IPhone X's design is noticeably lighter and much thinner than the Blackview BL8800, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. IPhone X has a bit better CPU than Blackview BL8800, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone X has a bit better looking display than Blackview BL8800, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and more screen brightness. The iPhone X has just a bit better camera than Blackview BL8800, although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution, they both have the same aperture.
The iPhone X features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Blackview BL8800, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Blackview BL8800 features a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 209% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.