Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is much better than the Blackview BL8800's general score of 71.9. Both phones in this comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should count with all the same operating system features. The Galaxy A51 is an noticeably older cellphone than Blackview BL8800, but Samsung was able to make it extremely thinner and lighter anyway.
The Blackview BL8800 counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2408. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A51's CPU is very similar to Blackview BL8800's processor, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Blackview BL8800 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 110% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 has a much better camera than Blackview BL8800, although it has a back-facing camera with less mega-pixels resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.