Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is way better than Blackview BL8800's 71.9 global score. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Blackview BL8800 has Android 11. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older device than the Blackview BL8800, but Samsung was able to build it notably lighter and way thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a slightly better screen than Blackview BL8800, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a bit bigger screen and a little more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little better processing power than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. Blackview BL8800 counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 8380mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.