Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is much better than the Blackview BL8800, getting a global score of 86.3 against 71.9. Galaxy S10e's body is thinner and a lot lighter than Blackview BL8800, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Blackview BL8800 features just a bit better screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2408px resolution and a little bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit superior processing unit than Blackview BL8800, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy S10e captures a little bit better photos and videos than Blackview BL8800, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better images and video in low light situations.
The Galaxy S10e has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Blackview BL8800 has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.