Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is way better than Blackview BL8800, getting a 94.8 score against 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy S20 construction is notably thinner and way lighter than the Blackview BL8800, even though it was released many years before. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version while Blackview BL8800 has Android 11 version, offering some extra features and performance optimizations.
Galaxy S20 counts with a little better performance than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little bit better display than Blackview BL8800, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S20 features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Blackview BL8800, although it has a way less mega pixels camera, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
The Blackview BL8800 features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.