Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than the Blackview BL8800's general score of 71.9. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Blackview BL8800 has Android 11. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is incredibly older than Blackview BL8800, it's construction is noticeably lighter and way thinner.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better looking screen than Blackview BL8800, because it has a better display pixel density, a quite bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit faster processor than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM. Blackview BL8800 has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures greater photos and videos than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.