Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is way better than Blackview BL8800's 71.9 general score. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Blackview BL8800 has Android 11 version. Even when the Galaxy S22 Ultra and Blackview BL8800 were only released 2 months apart, the Galaxy S22 Ultra is notably thinner and noticeably lighter.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Blackview BL8800, because it has a little bit larger screen, a greater pixel density, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a lot brighter screen. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit more powerful processor than Blackview BL8800. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Blackview BL8800, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. Blackview BL8800 features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 68 percent greater battery size.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes a lot better photographs and videos than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.