Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is way better than the Blackview BL8800, with a global score of 87.9 against 71.9. Although Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is older than Blackview BL8800, it's body is a lot thinner and much lighter. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version while Blackview BL8800 has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Blackview BL8800, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Blackview BL8800, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a way brighter display and a quite larger display.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's storage capacity for games and applications is just as good as Blackview BL8800's one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Blackview BL8800 has a very superior battery life than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 78 percent more battery size. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots way better photographs and videos than Blackview BL8800, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.