Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than Blackview BL8800, with a global score of 81.1 against 71.9. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much older than the Blackview BL8800, it's body is extremely lighter and way thinner. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version and Blackview BL8800 has Android 11 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little better performance than Blackview BL8800, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. Blackview BL8800 has a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2408px resolution and a quite higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Blackview BL8800, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, it also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Blackview BL8800, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Blackview BL8800 counts with a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has an 8380mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.