Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a global score of 79, which is a little bit better than the Blackview BL8800's global score of 71.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is an older cellphone than the Blackview BL8800, but Xiaomi made it lighter and incredibly thinner anyway. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should provide you identical OS features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a processing unit that is very similar to the Blackview BL8800 one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Blackview BL8800 counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2408px resolution and a just a bit greater pixel number in each screen inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a very superior camera than Blackview BL8800, although it has a lower 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, they both have a same size diafragm aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features more storage capacity for games and applications than Blackview BL8800, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Blackview BL8800 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has an 8380mAh battery capacity instead of 5020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.