Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-20 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.92 x 3.20 x 0.71 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora Orange, Emerald Green and Starry Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than the Blackview BV8100, getting an 83.8 score against 74.5. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A50 is incredibly older than Blackview BV8100, it's construction is extremely lighter and incredibly thinner. Blackview BV8100 has a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bit greater display pixel density and a quite larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A50's CPU is very similar to Blackview BV8100's processor, and although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Blackview BV8100 features much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A50, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB and more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a superior camera than Blackview BV8100, although it has a back facing camera with lot less megapixels. The Blackview BV8100 features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 120% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.