Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-20 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.92 x 3.20 x 0.71 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora Orange, Emerald Green and Starry Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than Blackview BV8100, with a score of 86.6 against 74.5. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Blackview BV8100 has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy A50s is an noticeably older phone than Blackview BV8100, but it's way lighter and a lot thinner anyway.
The Blackview BV8100 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A50s, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a just a bit higher pixels amount per screen inch and a quite bigger display. The Galaxy A50s counts with a bit superior processor than Blackview BV8100, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50s takes much clearer pictures and videos than Blackview BV8100, although it has a back facing camera with a worse 48 mega pixels resolution. The Blackview BV8100 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A50s, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB more internal storage.
The Blackview BV8100 features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has an 8800mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.