Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-20 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.92 x 3.20 x 0.71 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora Orange, Emerald Green and Starry Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than Blackview BV8100, getting a general score of 85.5 against 74.5. Samsung Galaxy A51's design is much thinner and lighter than the Blackview BV8100, even though it was released 4 years before. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version while Blackview BV8100 has Android 14.
The Blackview BV8100 has a way better display than Samsung Galaxy A51. Both of them have a display with the same size, an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution and the same count of pixels per inch in the display. The Blackview BV8100 and the Samsung Galaxy A51 both have extremely similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Blackview BV8100 counts with much more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The Blackview BV8100 counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 120 percent bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a way better camera than Blackview BV8100, although it has a lower 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.