Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.92 x 3.20 x 0.71 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora Orange, Emerald Green and Starry Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 4400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Blackview BV8100, getting a global score of 98.9 against 74.5. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version and Blackview BV8100 has Android 14 version. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter than Blackview BV8100, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before.
The Blackview BV8100 counts with a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little bit smaller display, a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little less pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit faster processor than Blackview BV8100, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Blackview BV8100, because it has a camera with lot more MP. The Blackview BV8100 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
Blackview BV8100 has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 8800mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.