Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-04-20 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.92 x 3.20 x 0.71 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora Orange, Emerald Green and Starry Black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 9.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 has a score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than Blackview BV8100's 74.5 global score. The Galaxy Note 5 is an much older device than the Blackview BV8100, but Samsung was able to build it noticeably thinner and much lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version and Blackview BV8100 has Android 14 version.
Blackview BV8100 has a bit better processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7 more processing cores and 4 GB more RAM. Blackview BV8100 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little worse pixel quantity per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Blackview BV8100 has much more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB and 192 GB more internal storage. Blackview BV8100 counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 193% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a better camera than Blackview BV8100, although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.