Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2024-04-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.92 x 3.20 x 0.71 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Aurora Orange, Emerald Green and Starry Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 4400 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than Blackview BV8100, getting a general score of 95.4 against 74.5. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the older 13 version and Blackview BV8100 has Android 14. The Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is way thinner and notably lighter than the Blackview BV8100, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit superior processing unit than Blackview BV8100. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The Blackview BV8100 counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a little smaller screen, it also counts with way more brightness.
Galaxy S22 Ultra takes way better videos and photos than Blackview BV8100, because it has a much better 108 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. Blackview BV8100 has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Blackview BV8100 features a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 76 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.