Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.92 x 3.20 x 0.71 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora Orange, Emerald Green and Starry Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 4400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Blackview BV8100, getting an 88.5 score against 74.5. Galaxy Z Flip's body is incredibly thinner and much lighter than the Blackview BV8100, even though it was released 4 years before. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version and Blackview BV8100 has Android 14.
Blackview BV8100 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little bit lower pixel density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better performance than Blackview BV8100. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy Z Flip has a greater camera than Blackview BV8100, although it has a way lower resolution camera. The Blackview BV8100 has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity, the Blackview BV8100 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Blackview BV8100 features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 8800mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.