Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-20 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.92 x 3.20 x 0.71 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora Orange, Emerald Green and Starry Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 4400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Blackview BV8100, getting a global score of 92.3 against 74.5. These devices have Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version and Blackview BV8100 has Android 14. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is notably thinner and way lighter than Blackview BV8100, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Blackview BV8100. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Blackview BV8100 has a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a just a little worse pixels density, a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit smaller screen.
The Blackview BV8100 features a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Blackview BV8100 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Blackview BV8100 features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 8800mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a very superior camera than Blackview BV8100, although it has a much worse 12 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.