Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-20 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.92 x 3.20 x 0.71 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora Orange, Emerald Green and Starry Black | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8800mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is just a bit better than the Blackview BV8100, getting a score of 79 against 74.5. Despite of the fact that the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is way older than Blackview BV8100, it's body is way lighter and extremely thinner. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 11 version and Blackview BV8100 has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a CPU that's very similar to the processor in Blackview BV8100, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Blackview BV8100 has a way better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Blackview BV8100 also counts with a bit greater screen pixel density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a very superior camera than Blackview BV8100, although it has a worse resolution back facing camera. The Blackview BV8100 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Blackview BV8100 has a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has an 8800mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.