Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-12 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 10.48 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is much better than Blackview BV8900, having an 84.2 score against 73.1. Apple iPhone XS's construction is way thinner and lighter than the Blackview BV8900, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The iPhone XS has a bit better looking screen than Blackview BV8900, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436, a brighter display and a little bit better quantity of pixels per screen inch.
Apple iPhone XS features a more powerful processor than Blackview BV8900, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The Blackview BV8900 counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Blackview BV8900 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 290% greater battery size. Apple iPhone XS shoots better pictures and videos than Blackview BV8900, although it has a way less mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.