Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2023-06-12 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 10.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is better than the Blackview BV8900's 73.1 global score. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Blackview BV8900 has Android 13, so it offers some nice extra features and optimized performance. The LG V30S ThinQ is an notably older cellphone than Blackview BV8900, but LG was able to make it way thinner and a lot lighter anyway.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Blackview BV8900, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880. Blackview BV8900 counts with a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has an external SD slot that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
LG V30S ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Blackview BV8900, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Blackview BV8900, although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Blackview BV8900 has a much longer battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 215% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.