Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-12 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 10.48 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is better than Blackview BV8900's overall score of 73.1. The LG Velvet body is lighter and way thinner than the Blackview BV8900, although it was released 3 years before. The Blackview BV8900 features a bit sharper display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2408 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per display inch.
Blackview BV8900 has a little bit better memory for applications and games than LG Velvet, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The LG Velvet has just a little better performance than Blackview BV8900, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The LG Velvet shoots much better pictures and videos than Blackview BV8900, although it has a way less mega pixels camera in the back. The Blackview BV8900 has a really longer battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 141% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.