Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-12 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 10.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than Blackview BV8900, getting an 83.8 score against 73.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy A50 is notably older than the Blackview BV8900, it's construction is noticeably thinner and notably lighter. Blackview BV8900 counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a little bit larger screen, a just a little higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2408 resolution.
Galaxy A50's CPU is very similar to the processor in Blackview BV8900, and although the Galaxy A50 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Blackview BV8900 has a much greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy A50, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A50 has a much better camera than Blackview BV8900, although it has a back camera with much less megapixels. Blackview BV8900 features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 10380mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.