Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-06-12 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 10.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is better than Blackview BV8900's 73.1 general score. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has 10 version while Blackview BV8900 has Android 13. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy A50s is incredibly older than the Blackview BV8900, it's body is notably thinner and noticeably lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little faster processor than Blackview BV8900, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Blackview BV8900 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A50s, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2408 pixels resolution, a quite better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a bit larger screen.
The Blackview BV8900 has much more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a greater camera than Blackview BV8900, although it has a lot lower 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Blackview BV8900 counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 10380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.