Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-12 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 10.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than Blackview BV8900, having an 85.5 score against 73.1. Samsung Galaxy A51's design is notably thinner and much lighter than the Blackview BV8900, although it was released 4 years before. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version and Blackview BV8900 has Android 13 version.
Samsung Galaxy A51 and Blackview BV8900 count with incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Blackview BV8900 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Blackview BV8900 also has a just a little better pixel density and a bit higher 1080 x 2408 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a greater camera than Blackview BV8900, although it has a lot lower resolution back-facing camera. The Blackview BV8900 features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Blackview BV8900 counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has 10380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.