Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-06-12 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 10.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is just a bit better than Blackview BV8900's 73.1 score. Samsung Galaxy A70 is an incredibly older cellphone than the Blackview BV8900, but it is notably lighter and thinner anyway. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version while Blackview BV8900 has Android 13 version.
The Blackview BV8900 features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Blackview BV8900 also has more RAM memory. Blackview BV8900 features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel density and a quite better 1080 x 2408px resolution.
Blackview BV8900 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A70, because it has 256 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Blackview BV8900 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A70. The Blackview BV8900 counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has a 10380mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.