Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-06-12 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 406 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 10.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is much better than Blackview BV8900's 73.1 score. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is lighter and a lot thinner than the Blackview BV8900, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and Blackview BV8900 has Android 13 version.
The Blackview BV8900 counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2408px. The Blackview BV8900 has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little faster processor than Blackview BV8900. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a way better camera than Blackview BV8900. Both have a camera with a 64 MP. The Blackview BV8900 counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 10380mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.