Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-12 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 10.48 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 is better than the Blackview BV8900, with a global score of 85.2 against 73.1. Despite of the fact that Galaxy F41 is notably older than the Blackview BV8900, it's body is thinner and incredibly lighter. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy F41 has the older 11 version while Blackview BV8900 has Android 13.
The Blackview BV8900 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2408 pixels, a little better number of pixels per inch in the display, a little bigger screen and a little bit brighter screen. The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a bit superior processor than Blackview BV8900, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy F41 captures much better videos and photos than Blackview BV8900. Both have the same resolution camera. The Blackview BV8900 features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F41, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage.
Blackview BV8900 has a way better battery performance than Galaxy F41, because it has 10380mAh of battery capacity against 6000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.